June 2009: David Eddings

July 8, 2009 at 8:59 pm (fantasy, in memoriam) ()

Naturally, my response to the death of David Eddings last month was to start re-reading his and Leigh’s books.  What better memorial is there for any author?  I went through The Belgariad (5 volumes) and part of its sequel The Mallorean before some other book distracted me.

I own a first edition paperback of Pawn of Prophecy, his first fantasy book.  It was being discarded from the library where I was working as a page, having gotten rather battered, and I repaired its properly torn-off cover with black electrical tape.  We’ve actually acquired an omnibus edition of the first two or three volumes, but I still like to re-read the more manageable single paperback sometimes.  Physically, it’s holding up rather well, tape and all.

So, what is there to say about books one first read in high school – books that were new, imaginative, and enthralling at that time, but have lost some of their luster over the years?  The Belgariad has a second world fantasy setting and grand sweep of events like The Lord of the Rings, but a cast that was much more homey and comfortable.  The characters were all human, and a lot more like modern people than Tolkien’s.  I liked that Garion came from a happy home, even though he was an orphan; the characters’ non-stop bickering and jokes were refreshingly different.  The Prophecy – well, I’m not sure that anyone has dared to duplicate the notion of a pair of self-aware prophecies working to make sure their own predictions became reality.  It would be extremely obvious where that idea came from, I suppose.  That the genre has become littered with examples of inevitable prophecies is hardly his fault; we could blame Sophocles for that, too, but it wouldn’t make any more sense.

Similarly, I’ve heard this particular kind of story derided as “plot coupon” fantasy – in which the characters travel around, picking up the necessary information, objects, or whatever, in order to reach the foregone conclusion.  The fact is, though, that given the way Eddings structured the world of these books, that sequence makes perfect and necessary sense.  That other authors have done the same thing without supplying such a supporting structure is their fault, not his.

Still, it’s true that these books are not great literature, a fact that’s become more and more clear to me as I’ve expanded my reading over the years.  I’ve sometimes called them “potato chip fantasy” – greasy, salty, not particularly filling, but very easy to enjoy.  And so what?  Not every book has to be deep and meaningful.  Sometimes a light read is just what I’m in the mood for.

The one thing that has really disappointed me about the Eddings body of work is that David and Leigh apparently only had one story in them: a band of heroes goes on a long journey and saves the world from a great evil.  No, there’s one other thing – over the decades of their career, I detected no significant change in their writing style or approach to characterization or plotting.  We bought The Belgariad, and The Mallorean in hardcover, and their semi-prequels Belgarath the Sorceror and Polgara the Sorceress in hardcover (the latter we own in the British edition, as we were in London at the time of its release and didn’t want to wait to get home before buying it).  We bought The Elenium (in hardcover), which featured a nicely significant change in setting but not much else that was different.  But we didn’t buy the sequel series to that one, and while I read The Redemption of Althalus, that was from the library.  I haven’t even looked at The Dreamers series.  We own as much Eddings as we’re interested in owning.  We re-read them from time to time, when we’re in the mood for light fantasy that we remember fondly.

The “About the Author” section in the Eddings books we own attribute the decision to write them to interest in exploring “technical and philosophical ideas” about fantasy literature.  I suspect that these ideas might actually boil down to “Can I make a living writing this stuff?”  The answer, fortunately, was “yes.”  They are light, fun books with just enough depth of character and theme to keep from being totally superficial, solidly written and with entertaining dialogue.  I have no objection to authors making a living, whether they write books I like to read or not.  It may be that in the next decades, these books will be largely forgotten – like so many other books from the same period.  So what?  I like them.  When I want deep or gut-wrenching or really angsty fiction, I’ll just read something else.

Rest in peace, David and Leigh Eddings.  You did some good work.  Thank you.


1 Comment

  1. Paul said,

    Indeed so.

    I remember back in High School talking with one of my classmates about the first series, explaining the naming conventions of the novels as related to Chess.

    Sure, the series was and is “plot coupon” fantasy of the type that is derided in, say, The Tough Guide to Fantasyland, but that doesn’t make them any less entertaining.

    Are Eddings’ books High Literature with Portentious Themes and Matter that is going to last 1000 years? No. But that’s okay. Not every book, and not every book I read, needs to be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: